Human autonomy, technological automation (and reverse)

26Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We continuously talk about autonomous technologies. But how can words qualifying technologies be the very same words chosen by Kant to define what is essentially human, i.e. being autonomous? The article focuses on a possible answer by reflecting upon both etymological and philosophical issues, as well as upon the case of autonomous vehicles. Most interestingly, on the one hand, we have the notion of (human) “autonomy”, meaning that there is a “law” that is “self-given”, and, on the other hand, we have the notion of (technological) “automation”, meaning that there is something “offhand” that is “self-given”. Yet, we are experiencing a kind of twofold shift: on the one hand, the shift from defining technologies in terms of automation to defining technologies in terms of autonomy and, on the other hand, the shift from defining humans in terms of autonomy to defining humans in terms of automation. From a philosophical perspective, the shift may mean that we are trying to escape precisely from what autonomy founds, i.e. individual responsibility of humans that, in the Western culture, have been defined for millennia as rational and moral decision-makers, even when their decisions have been the toughest. More precisely, the shift may mean that we are using technologies, and in particular emerging algorithmic technologies, as scapegoats that bear responsibility for us by making decisions for us. Moreover, if we consider the kind of emerging algorithmic technologies that increasingly surround us, starting from autonomous vehicles, then we may argue that we also seem to create a kind of technological divine that, by being always with us through its immanent omnipresence, omniscience, omnipotence and inscrutability, can always be our technological scapegoat freeing us from the most unbearable burden of individual responsibility resulting from individual autonomy.

References Powered by Scopus

Structures of Agency: Essays

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Operationalizing the Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: An Engineering Perspective

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring the role of AI algorithmic agents: The impact of algorithmic decision autonomy on consumer purchase decisions

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiodo, S. (2022). Human autonomy, technological automation (and reverse). AI and Society, 37(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01149-5

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

42%

Engineering 3

25%

Philosophy 2

17%

Computer Science 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0