Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression

9Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To reduce the acquisition time associated with the two-point Dixon fat suppression technique by combining a keyhole in-phase (Water + Fat) k-space data set with a full out-of-phase (Water - Fat) k-space data set and optimizing the keyhole size with a perceptual difference model. Materials and Methods: A set of keyhole Dixon images was created by varying the number of lines in the keyhole data set. Off-resonance correction was incorporated into the image reconstruction process to improve the homogeneity of the fat suppression. A perceptual difference model (PDM) was validated with human observer experiments and used to compare the keyhole images to images from a full two-point Dixon acquisition. The PDM was used to determine the smallest keyhole width required to obtain perceptual equivalence to images obtained from the full two-point Dixon method. Results: In experimental phantom studies, the keyhole Dixon image reconstructed from 96 of 192 Water + Fat k-space lines and 192 Water - Fat k-space lines was perceptually equivalent to the full (192 + 192) two-point Dixon images, resulting in a 25% reduction in scan time. Clinical images of a volunteer's knee, orbits, and abdomen created from the smallest, perceptually equivalent keyhole width resulted in a 27%-38% reduction in total scan time. Conclusion: This method improves the temporal efficiency of the conventional two-point Dixon technique and may prove especially useful for high-field systems where specific absorption rate (SAR) limits will constrain radiofrequency (RF)-based fat suppression techniques. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flask, C. A., Salem, K. A., Moriguchi, H., Lewin, J. S., Wilson, D. L., & Duerk, J. L. (2003). Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 18(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free