Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies

56Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose Recent epidemiologic studies indicate elevated risks for some lymphohematopoietic malignancies (LHM) related to formaldehyde exposure. We performed a systematic review of literature to assess the strength and consistency of associations. Methods We summarized published literature in the PubMed database of the National Library of Medicine during 1966-2012. Literature was categorized according to study design and population: industrial cohort studies, professional cohort studies, and population-based case- control studies. Results Findings from occupational cohort and population-based case-control studies were very inconsistent for LHM, including myeloid leukemia. Apart from some isolated exceptions, relative risks were close to the null, and there was little evidence for dose-response relations for any of the LHM. Conclusions At present, there is no consistent or strong epidemiologic evidence that formaldehyde is causally related to any of the LHM. The absence of established toxicologicalmechanisms further weakens any arguments for causation. To be informative, future epidemiologic research should improve on formaldehyde exposure assessment and apply modern diagnostic schemes for specific LHM. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Checkoway, H., Boffetta, P., Mundt, D. J., & Mundt, K. A. (2012, November). Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Causes and Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-0055-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

50%

Researcher 8

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

60%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

20%

Chemistry 3

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free