Comparison of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and intimal media thickness in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

93Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - Flow associated dilatation (FAD%) and intimal media thickness are established markers of early atherosclerosis. This study aimed to compare the ability of the non-invasive measurements FAD% and intimal media thickness to predict coronary artery disease. Methods - FAD% and intimal media thickness were determined using high resolution ultrasound in 122 patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease before coronary angiography. Results are given as mean (SD). Results - Patients with coronary artery disease had reduced FAD% compared with those with angiographically normal coronary vessels (3.7 (4.1) υ 7.0 (3.5)%, p < 0.001), whereas intimal media thickness tended to be increased in patients with coronary artery disease (0.58 (0.35) υ 0.47 (0.11)mm, p = 0.054). There was a negative correlation between FAD% and intimal media thickness (R = - 0.317, p = 0.0004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that FAD% ≤ 4.5% predicted coronary artery disease with a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.80) and a specificity of 0.81 (0.58 to 0.95). In contrast, intimal media thickness showed a positive correlation with the extent of coronary artery disease (number of vessels with a lesion ≤ 50%) (R = 0.324, p = 0.0003), without a clear cut off point. Conclusions - In patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease, FAD% discriminates between the presence or absence of coronary artery disease, whereas intimal media thickness is associated more with the extent of coronary artery disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Enderle, M. D., Schroeder, S., Ossen, R., Meisner, C., Baumbach, A., Haering, H. U., … Pfohl, M. (1998). Comparison of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and intimal media thickness in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Heart, 80(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.80.4.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free