Fox and Epstein interrogate and reimagine menstrual tracking technology, focusing on mobile applications designed to document and quantify menstrual cycle data. While such technology promises to provide users with new insights and predictions, the authors highlight how these apps are inscribed with particular visions of menstruation and encourage users to extract intimate information about their bodies. Apps regularly assume, for instance, that all possible users are women, heterosexual, and monogamous, have a “normal” cycle, and use tracking techniques exclusively to gauge fertility. Fox and Epstein present two case studies: (1) examining core issues of usability and inclusion in the design of existing applications; and (2) using participatory approaches to highlight the lived experiences of menstruators and introduce alternatives to dominant menstrual app protocols. In offering this two-part analysis, they point to important openings for exploring how these technologies might support the needs of a multiplicity of menstruating bodies.
CITATION STYLE
Fox, S., & Epstein, D. A. (2020). Monitoring Menses: Design-Based Investigations of Menstrual Tracking Applications. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies (pp. 733–750). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_54
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.