Australian interventions for women in computing: Are we evaluating?

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are many reasons why the gender imbalance in computing should be of concern to the profession. Over the last 20 years there have been many intervention programs which attempt to redress this situation and encourage more women into computing. To determine whether an intervention program has made a difference requires evaluation. Program evaluation is the careful collecting of information about a program so that those responsible can make informed decisions regarding the programs. This multi-case study investigation into 14 major programs conducted in Australia shows that many projects are not evaluated due to a lack of time, expertise and money. Without dissemination of detailed evaluations it is not possible to work out which intervention programs should be replicated and which should be modified or abandoned.

References Powered by Scopus

Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism

643Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: A model of girls' career choices

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WP:clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Computing, girls and education: What we need to know to change how girls think about information technology

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring women's motivations to study computer science

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating a complex and sustained STEM engagement programme through the lens of science capital: insights from Northeast England

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Craig, A. (2014). Australian interventions for women in computing: Are we evaluating? Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i2.849

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

83%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

63%

Design 1

13%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0