The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: a Review

413Citations
Citations of this article
349Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a common perception that excess adiposity, commonly approximated by body mass index (BMI), is associated with reduced cancer survival. A number of studies have emerged challenging this by demonstrating that overweight and early obese states are associated with improved survival. This finding is termed the “obesity paradox” and is well recognized in the cardio-metabolic literature but less so in oncology. Here, we summarize the epidemiological findings related to the obesity paradox in cancer. Our review highlights that many observations of the obesity paradox in cancer reflect methodological mechanisms including the crudeness of BMI as an obesity measure, confounding, detection bias, reverse causality, and a specific form of the selection bias, known as collider bias. It is imperative for the oncologist to interpret the observation of the obesity paradox against the above methodological framework and avoid the misinterpretation that being obese might be “good” or “protective” for cancer patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lennon, H., Sperrin, M., Badrick, E., & Renehan, A. G. (2016, September 1). The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: a Review. Current Oncology Reports. Current Medicine Group LLC 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0539-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free