Validation of the effectiveness of an optimized EPMcreate as an aid for creative requirements elicitation

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

[Context and Motivation] Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, and techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. [Question/Problem] This paper describes a controlled experiment to compare the requirements-elicitation effectiveness of three creativity enhancement techniques: (1) full EPMcreate; (2) Power-Only EPMcreate, an optimization of full EPMcreate; and (3) traditional brainstorming. [Principal ideas/Results] Each technique was used by teams of students each of which applied its technique to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school's public Web site. [Contribution] The results of this first experiment indicate that Power-Only EPMcreate is more effective, by the quantity and quality of the ideas generated, than full EPMcreate, which is, in turn, more effective than brainstorming. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakhnini, V., Berry, D. M., & Mich, L. (2010). Validation of the effectiveness of an optimized EPMcreate as an aid for creative requirements elicitation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6182 LNCS, pp. 91–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free