In a world of P=BPP

28Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We show that proving results such as BPP = P essentially necessitate the construction of suitable pseudorandom generators (i.e., generators that suffice for such derandomization results). In particular, the main incarnation of this equivalence refers to the standard notion of uniform derandomization and to the corresponding pseudorandom generators (i.e., the standard uniform notion of "canonical derandomizers"). This equivalence bypasses the question of which hardness assumptions are required for establishing such derandomization results, which has received considerable attention in the last decade or so (starting with Impagliazzo and Wigderson [JCSS, 2001]). We also identify a natural class of search problems that can be solved by deterministic polynomial-time reductions to BPP. This result is instrumental to the construction of the aforementioned pseudorandom generators (based on the assumption BPP = P), which is actually a reduction of the "construction problem" to BPP. Caveat: Throughout the text, we abuse standard notation by letting BPP, P etc denote classes of promise problems. We are aware of the possibility that this choice may annoy some readers, but believe that promise problem actually provide the most adequate formulation of natural decisional problems. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldreich, O. (2011). In a world of P=BPP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6650 LNCS, 191–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22670-0_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free