Scepticism and Positive Mental Health

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proposal that scepticism is possible in practice immediately gives rise to a further question: whether, and in what respect, scepticism is at all practically desirable. The host of issues associated with this question cannot be adequately discussed here. Before going on to discuss scepticism in the light of more or less purely epistemological considerations, we can at least pause to consider how scepticism stands with regard to an area in which the practical issues have already been formulated in comparatively precise terms, and the normative issues, as criteria for mental health, have been agreed on more or less, if only implicitly. What I propose to do here, therefore, is subject the radical sceptic to the test of currently accepted criteria of positive mental health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scepticism and Positive Mental Health. (2007). In The Selected Works of Arne Naess (pp. 581–594). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free