Living and Nonliving Occasionalism

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Graham Harman's Object-Oriented Ontology has employed a variant of occasionalist causation since 2002, with sensual objects acting as the mediators of causation between real objects. While the mechanism for living beings creating sensual objects is clear, how nonliving objects generate sensual objects is not. This essay sets out an interpretation of occasionalism where the mediating agency of nonliving contact is the virtual particles of nominally empty space. Since living, conscious, real objects need to hold sensual objects as sub-components, but nonliving objects do not, this leads to an explanation of why consciousness, in Object-Oriented Ontology, might be described as doubly withdrawn: A sensual sub-component of a withdrawn real object.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weir, S. (2020). Living and Nonliving Occasionalism. Open Philosophy, 3(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free