The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings

19Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Intracranial electroencephalographic (icEEG) recordings provide invaluable insights into neural dynamics in hu¬mans because of their unmatched spatiotemporal resolution. Yet, such recordings reflect the combined activ¬ity of multiple underlying generators, confounding the ability to resolve spatially distinct neural sources. To empirically quantify the listening zone of icEEG recordings, we computed correlations between signals as a function of distance (full width at half maximum; FWHM) between 8752 recording sites in 71 patients (33 fe¬male) implanted with either subdural electrodes (SDEs), stereo-encephalography electrodes (sEEG), or high- density sEEG electrodes. As expected, for both SDEs and sEEGs, higher frequency signals exhibited a sharper fall off relative to lower frequency signals. For broadband high g (BHG) activity, the mean FWHM of SDEs (6.6 ± 2.5 mm) and sEEGs in gray matter (7.14 ± 1.7 mm) was not significantly different; however, FWHM for low frequencies recorded by sEEGs was 2.45 mm smaller than SDEs. White matter sEEGs showed much lower power for frequencies 17-200 Hz (q < 0.01) and a much broader decay (11.3 ± 3.2 mm) than gray matter electrodes (7.14 ± 1.7 mm). The use of a bipolar referencing scheme significantly lowered FWHM for sEEGs, relative to a white matter reference or a common average reference (CAR). These results outline the influence of array design, spectral bands, and referencing schema on local field potential recordings and source local¬ization in icEEG recordings in humans. The metrics we derive have immediate relevance to the analysis and in¬terpretation of both cognitive and epileptic data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCarty, M. J., Woolnough, O., Mosher, J. C., Seymour, J., & Tandon, N. (2022). The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings. ENeuro, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0492-21.2022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free