Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices

28Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The fluid warming capabilities of the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido devices were evaluated in the laboratory with gravity flow via a 14G cannula (1 m head of fluid) and with the fluid bag pressurised to 300 mmHg. The resulting flows (70-450 ml.min-1) were recorded. At a room temperature of 22 °C, no device warmed the fluid to 37 °C. However, the Standard Ranger with gravity flow and the Fluido with both gravity and pressurised flow achieved 35 °C, whereas the Bair Hugger and Hotline with both gravity and pressurised flow, and the Standard Ranger with pressurised flow, achieved only 24-31 °C. However, from the way delivered temperatures changed with flow, we calculated that all four devices would achieve close to 37 °C at the flows specified by the manufacturers: 17, 83, 150 and 800 ml.min-1 for the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido, respectively. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation 2006 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner, M., Hodzovic, I., & Mapleson, W. W. (2006). Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices. Anaesthesia, 61(6), 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04589.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free