The national neurosurgery quality and outcomes database (N2QOD): General overview and pilot-year project description

187Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Given the unsustainable costs of US health care, universal agreement exists among payers, regulatory agencies, and other health care stakeholders that reform must include substantial improvements in the quality, effectiveness, and value of health care delivery. The Institute of Medicine and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 have called for the establishment of prospective registries to capture patient-centered data from real-world practice as a high priority to guide evidence-based reform. As a result, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons launched the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD) and began enrolling patients in March 2012 into its initial pilot project: a web-based lumbar spine module. As a nationwide, prospective longitudinal registry utilizing patient reported outcome instruments, the N2QOD lumbar spine surgery pilot aims to systematically measure and aggregate surgical safety and 1-year postoperative outcome data from approximately 30 neurosurgical practices across the US with the primary aim of demonstrating the feasibility and validity of standardized 1-year outcome measurement from everyday real-world practice. At the end of the pilot year, 1) risk-adjusted modeling will be developed for the safety, quality, and effectiveness of lumbar surgical care (morbidity, readmission, improvements in pain, disability, quality of life, and return to work); 2) data integrity and validation will be demonstrated via internal quality control analyses and auditing, and 3) the feasibility of obtaining a high level of follow-up (~80%) of nationwide 1-year outcome measurement will be established. N2QOD will use only prospective clinical data, will avoid the use of administrative data proxies, and will rely on neurosurgically relevant risk factors for risk adjustment. Once national benchmarks of quality and effectiveness are accurately established and validated utilizing practice-based data extractors in the pilot year, N2QOD aims to introduce non-full-time employee (FTE)-dependent methodologies such as electronic medical record auto-extraction. N2QOD's non-FTE-dependent methodologies can then be validated against practice-based data extractor-derived measures of safety and effectiveness with the aim of more rapid expansion into the majority of US practice groups. The general overview, methods, and registry design of the N2QOD pilot year (lumbar module) are presented here. © AANS, 2013.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35341Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life

0
12890Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The oswestry disability index

4361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Frequency and predictors of complications in neurological surgery: National trends from 2006 to 2011: Clinical article

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: Predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N<sup>2</sup>QOD): A collaborative north American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGirt, M. J., Speroff, T., Dittus, R. S., Harrell, F. E., & Asher, A. L. (2013). The national neurosurgery quality and outcomes database (N2QOD): General overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurgical Focus, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12297

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

61%

Researcher 26

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 58

82%

Neuroscience 5

7%

Computer Science 4

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free