Lung involvement in macrophage activation syndrome and severe COVID-19: Results from a cross-sectional study to assess clinical, laboratory and artificial intelligence-radiological differences

38Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the clinical pictures, laboratory tests and imaging of patients with lung involvement, either from severe COVID-19 or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), in order to assess how similar these two diseases are. Methods The present work has been designed as a cross-sectional single-centre study to compare characteristics of patients with lung involvement either from MAS or severe COVID-19. Chest CT scans were assessed by using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software. Results Ten patients with MAS and 47 patients with severe COVID-19 with lung involvement were assessed. Although all patients showed fever and dyspnoea, patients with MAS were characterised by thrombocytopaenia, whereas patients with severe COVID-19 were characterised by lymphopaenia and neutrophilia. Higher values of H-score characterised patients with MAS when compared with severe COVID-19. AI-reconstructed images of chest CT scan showed that apical, basal, peripheral and bilateral distributions of ground-glass opacities (GGOs), as well as apical consolidations, were more represented in severe COVID-19 than in MAS. C reactive protein directly correlated with GGOs extension in both diseases. Furthermore, lymphopaenia inversely correlated with GGOs extension in severe COVID-19. Conclusions Our data could suggest laboratory and radiological differences between MAS and severe COVID-19, paving the way for further hypotheses to be investigated in future confirmatory studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruscitti, P., Bruno, F., Berardicurti, O., Acanfora, C., Pavlych, V., Palumbo, P., … Giacomelli, R. (2020). Lung involvement in macrophage activation syndrome and severe COVID-19: Results from a cross-sectional study to assess clinical, laboratory and artificial intelligence-radiological differences. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 79(9), 1152–1155. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free