Google's Project Nightingale highlights the necessity of data science ethics review

  • Schneble C
  • Elger B
  • Shaw D
21Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

On November 14 last year, the British Guardian published an account from an anonymous whistleblower at Google, accusing the company of misconduct in regard to handling sensitive health data. The whistleblower works for Project Nightingale, an attempt by Google to get into the lucrative US healthcare market, by storing and processing the personal medical data of up to 50 million customers of Ascension, one of America's largest healthcare providers. As the Wall Street Journal had already reported 3 days earlier, and as the whistleblower confirmed, neither was the data anonymized when transmitted from Ascension nor were patients or their doctors notified, let alone asked for consent to sharing their data with Google (Copeland, 2019; Pilkington, 2019). As a result, Google employees had full access to non-anonymous patient health data. Google Health chief David Feinberg commented that all Google employees involved had gone through medical ethics training and were approved by Ascension (Feinberg, 2019).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneble, C. O., Elger, B. S., & Shaw, D. M. (2020). Google’s Project Nightingale highlights the necessity of data science ethics review. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202012053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free