Clinical and immunological assessment of Mycobacterium vaccae (SRL172) with chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma

20Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the toxicity of intratumoural/intrapleural SRL172 in addition to intradermal SRL172 and standard chemotherapy (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) in patients with malignant mesothelioma. Patients received chemotherapy (mitomycin-C: 8 mg m-2, vinblastine: 6 mg m-2, cisplatin 50 mg m-2) on a 3-weekly basis for up to six courses. IP SRL172 injections were given 3-weekly prior to chemotherapy and escalated in groups of three patients from 1 μg to 1 mg bacilli in 10-fold increments. Patients were also given ID SRL172 at a dose of 1 mg bacilli 4-weekly. Patients were assessed for toxicity after each course of chemotherapy and for response by CT imaging. Immuno-haematological parameters were analyzed pre-treatment and 1 month after completion of treatment. There was no dose limiting toxicity with IP SRL172 although there was greater toxicity at the highest dose (n=13). There were six out of 16 partial responses (37.5%). Haemato-immunological parameters, measured in seven patients pre and post-therapy, revealed that response rate correlated with a decrease in platelet count and there was an increase in activation of natural killer cells and a decrease in the percentage of IL-4 producing T cells in all tested patients post-treatment. SRL172 can be given safely into tumour deposits and the pleural cavity in patients with malignant mesothelioma and we have established the dose for phase II testing. © 2002 The Cancer Research Campaign.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendes, R., O’brien, M. E. R., Mitra, A., Norton, A., Gregory, R. K., Padhani, A. R., … Souberbielle, B. E. (2002). Clinical and immunological assessment of Mycobacterium vaccae (SRL172) with chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma. British Journal of Cancer, 86(3), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free