Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal

  • Wijayanta T
  • Aristya S
  • Basuki K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The conception of “formal truth” in civil procedure is about to become a debate among academicians and practitioners because it is deemed no longer relevant to achieve justice. Modern paradigm begins to consider that this concept should be given similar interpretation with material truth theory adhered by criminal procedure. Konsep kebenaran formal dalam acara perdata mulai menjadi perdebatan di antara para akademisi dan praktisi karena dianggap sudah tidak lagi relevan dan jauh dari rasa keadilan. Paradigma saat ini mesti mulai mempertimbangkan bahwa konsep kebenaran formal harus diberi pengertian yang sama dengan konsep kebenaran material dalam acara pidana.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wijayanta, T., Aristya, S. D. F., Basuki, K., Herliana, Ms., Halili, H., Sutanto, RB., & Supartinah, R. (2012). Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 22(3), 572. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free