Responsible design and assessment of a SARS-CoV virtual reality rehabilitation programme: guidance ethics in context

10Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In many digital health technologies, the design does not align with the needs and values of users within a specific healthcare context. This results in low uptake of these technologies. Health technology assessments should encourage successful technology adoption. Yet, its traditional focus on the cost-effectiveness of technology results in missing important qualitative insights. More recent initiatives to include qualitative outcomes in assessments generally remain too speculative to identify the actual effect of technology on individual needs and values. In this article, we adjust the ‘guidance ethics’ framework to study the lived value experiences of users while interacting with technology in context. We apply this novel framework in a case study of developing and evaluating a virtual reality rehabilitation service for long COVID patients. We end the article by evaluating the strengths and limitations of this novel framework as an addition to traditional health technology assessments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smits, M., Ludden, G. D. S., Verbeek, P. P., & van Goor, H. (2022). Responsible design and assessment of a SARS-CoV virtual reality rehabilitation programme: guidance ethics in context. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9(3), 344–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2076986

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free