Severed Heads and Floggings: The Undermining of Oblivion in Ulster in the Aftermath of 1798

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A considerable body of literature on ‘transitional justice’ has commented on the advocacy of forgetting that is inherent in amnesty settlements. The main focus has been on transitions from authoritarian states to democracies in the second half of the twentieth century, with regards to dispensations given to perpetrators of state violence under the former regime, but it should be acknowledged that many of these amnesties provided arrangements for the integration of former opponents of the state, including armed insurgents.1 A longer historical perspective exposes the inability of modern states to enforce uniform collective amnesia of their troubled and conflicted pasts. Official constructions of memory are constantly subject to contestations from counter-memories, defiantly upheld by oppositional groups. Less noticed perhaps is how rehabilitated loyal sectors of society, which seemingly had a vested interest in forgetting their previous political oppositional affiliations, would also cling on to memories of pain and suffering caused by the government to which they now professed allegiance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beiner, G. (2016). Severed Heads and Floggings: The Undermining of Oblivion in Ulster in the Aftermath of 1798. In New Directions in Irish and Irish American Literature (pp. 77–97). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31388-7_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free