Path Planning Algorithms Benchmarking for Grapevines Pruning and Monitoring

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Labour shortage is a reality in agriculture. Farmers are asking for solutions to automate agronomic tasks, such as monitoring, pruning, spraying, and harvesting. The automation of these tasks requires, most of the time, the use of robotic arms to mimic human arms capabilities. The current robotic arm based solutions available, both in the market and in the scientific sphere, have several limitations, such as, low-speed manipulation, the path planning algorithms are not aware of the requirements of the agricultural tasks (robotic motion and manipulation synchronisation), and require active perception tuning to the end-target point. This work benchmarks algorithms from open manipulation planning library (OMPL) considering a cost-effective six-degree freedom manipulator in a simulated vineyard. The OMPL planners shown a very low performance under demanding pruning tasks. The best and most promising results are performed and obtained by BiTRRT. However, further work is needed to increase its performance and reduce planning time. This benchmark work helps the reader to understand the limitations of each algorithm and when to use them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magalhães, S. A., dos Santos, F. N., Martins, R. C., Rocha, L. F., & Brito, J. (2019). Path Planning Algorithms Benchmarking for Grapevines Pruning and Monitoring. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11805 LNAI, pp. 295–306). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30244-3_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free