The accelerating invasion: dispersal rates of cane toads at an invasion front compared to an already-colonized location

20Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evolutionary theory predicts that individuals at an expanding range edge will disperse faster than conspecifics in long-colonized locations, but direct evidence is rare. Previous reports of high rates of dispersal of cane toads (Rhinella marina) at the invasion front have been based on studies at a single site in the Northern Territory. To replicate the earlier work, we radio-tracked free-ranging toads in the Kimberley region of northwestern Australia (at the westward-spreading invasion front) and 500 km northeast, on the Adelaide River floodplain of the Northern Territory (where toads had already been present for 6 years). For comparison, we also radio-tracked native frogs (Litoria caerulea and L. splendida) at the same sites. Consistent with the earlier reports, invasion-front cane toads travelled further per day, were more highly directional, and re-used refuge sites less frequently, than did conspecifics from an already-colonized site. In contrast, native frogs showed similar movement patterns in the two study areas. Our results confirm previous reports, and suggest that accelerated dispersal may be a common feature of individuals at the vanguard of a biological invasion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pizzatto, L., Both, C., Brown, G., & Shine, R. (2017). The accelerating invasion: dispersal rates of cane toads at an invasion front compared to an already-colonized location. Evolutionary Ecology, 31(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9896-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free