This paper examines advocacy initiatives by humanitarian and human rights organisations to address problems of governance in resource-rich and conflict-affected countries, focussing on the case of Argola. Humanitarian principles preclude the use of indiscriminate conditionality and point towards a cautious approach to advocacy aimed at assisting vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the relatively insignificant amount of aid supplied to resource-rich local authorities means that individual agencies have precious little leverage, especially when commercial interests rather than humanitarian or 'good governance' principles influence the priorities of bilateral donors. A context of resource wealth calls for: high levels of coordination and cooperation between human rights groups, aid agencies and donors; balanced use of conditionality, based on the drawing, by donors, of a clear distinction between emergency and development-oriented assistance; and a sustained effort to highlight the responsibilities of local authorities foreign governments and businesses in meeting humanitarian and development objectives. © Overseas Development Institute, 2005.
CITATION STYLE
Le Billon, P. (2005). Aid in the midst of plenty: Oil wealth, misery and advocacy in Angola. Disasters, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00271.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.