Long-term biomechanical properties of rabbit cornea after photodynamic collagen crosslinking

164Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Photodynamic riboflavin/ultraviolet-A (UVA)-induced collagen cross-linking, which increases the biomechanical stiffness of the human cornea by about 300%, has been introduced recently as a possible treatment for progressive keratoconus. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the longterm biomechanical effects of this new cross-linking treatment as a necessary prerequisite to its clinical success. Methods: The corneas of the left eyes of nine male rabbits were cross-linked. The contralateral eyes served as controls. After removal of the central 7 mm of the epithelium, the corneas were treated with the photosensitizer riboflavin and UVA irradiation for 30 mins with an irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 using a 370-nm UVA double diode. Groups of three animals were killed immediately after treatment and at 3 and 8 months, respectively. Biomechanical stress-strain measurements were performed using a microcomputer-controlled biomaterial tester on 4 × 10-mm corneal strips. Results: Corneal thickness in the treated rabbit cornea was 408 ± 20 μm. A constant and significant increase in ultimate stress (of 69.7-106.0%), Young's modulus of elasticity (of 78.4-87.4%) and a decrease in ultimate strain (of 0.57-78.4%) were found over a time period of up to 8 months after cross-linking treatment. Conclusions: Riboflavin/UVA-induced collagen cross-linking leads to a longterm increase in biomechanical rigidity which remains stable over time. These data support our previous longterm clinical observations and give hope that this new treatment will halt progressive keratoconus definitively. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wollensak, G., & Iomdina, E. (2009). Long-term biomechanical properties of rabbit cornea after photodynamic collagen crosslinking. Acta Ophthalmologica, 87(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01190.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free