Gender recognition at the crossroads: Four models and the compass of comparative law

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The article explores the different constitutional developments of the right to gender recognition and discusses their potential to protect trans and nonbinary people. Focusing on a few selected jurisdictions, each incarnating a specific kind of recognition system, it also proposes a conceptual map to understand and identify the different shapes of such a right. The article argues that four types of gender recognition can be identified, each with their own characteristics, advantages, peculiarities, and set of challenges for trans and nonbinary people and for the system of gender categorization itself. In clarifying this area of law, the article contends that the very process of creation and policing of gender identities and categories represents a critical aspect of contemporary gender constitutionalism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osella, S., & Rubio-Marín, R. (2023). Gender recognition at the crossroads: Four models and the compass of comparative law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(2), 574–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free