This article reviews recent ethnographies of war that shed light on interconnected states of security at home, international military interventions, and hybrid or rhizomic warfare doctrines. I suggest the notion of hybrid peace to explore global implications of these ethnographic perspectives and to ask what it means to inhabit spaces that are constituted by such hybrid warfare. I argue for the usefulness of Schmitt's “nomos of the earth” and his theory of the partisan to conceptualize this condition and bring together different approaches to warfare.
CITATION STYLE
Ssorin-Chaikov, N. (2018). Hybrid Peace: Ethnographies of War. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050139
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.