Genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout salvelinus fontinalis commonly stocked in lake superior

8Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fitness related traits often show spatial variation across populations of widely distributed species. Comparisons of genetic variation among populations in putatively neutral DNA markers and in phenotypic traits susceptible to selection (QST FST analysis) can be used to determine to what degree differentiation among populations can be attributed to selection or genetic drift. Traditionally, QST FST analyses require a large number of populations to achieve sufficient statistical power; however, new methods have been developed that allow QST FST comparisons to be conducted on as few as two populations if their pedigrees are informative. This study compared genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis that were historically or currently used for stocking in the Lake Superior Basin. Herein we examined if morphological divergence among populations showed temporal variation, and if divergence could be attributed to selection or was indistinguishable from genetic drift. Multivariate QST FST analysis showed evidence for divergent selection between populations. Univariate analyses suggests that the pattern observed in the multivariate analyses was largely driven by divergent selection for length and weight, and moreover by divergence between the Assinica strain and each of the Iron River and Siskiwit strains rather than divergent selection between each population pair. While it could not be determined if divergence was due to natural selection or inadvertent artificial selection in hatcheries, selected differences were consistent with patterns of domestication commonly found in salmonids.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Location of region analyzed for skin reflectance (box) and placement of landmarks for analyzing body morphology (circles). Image modified with permission from [31] and [23].
  • Figure 2. Standardized reflectance for each strain across sampling time points. *Indicates that all three strains are significantly different. **Indicates that Assinica is significantly different from both Siskiwit and Iron River. Magnitude of reflectance for the last time point is not directly comparable to the first two as a different intensity standard was used.
  • Figure 3. Phenotypic trait distributions for the mean ancestral (A) genotype for trait pairs under neutral expectations at sampling period 1, together with observed population trait values in Assinica (1), Iron River (2), and Siskiwit (3).
  • Figure 4. Phenotypic trait distributions for the mean ancestral (A) genotype for trait pairs under neutral expectations at sampling period 2, together with observed population trait values in Assinica (1), Iron River (2), and Siskiwit (3).
  • Figure 5. Phenotypic trait distributions for the mean ancestral (A) genotype for trait pairs under neutral expectations at sampling period 3, together with observed population trait values in Assinica (1), Iron River (2), and Siskiwit (3).
  • Table 1. Signals of selection (S from driftsel) for univariate traits at each time point for different groupings of populations.

References Powered by Scopus

FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-statistics

6806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution

1210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits

676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reliance on lakes by salmon, trout and charr (Oncorhynchus, Salmo and Salvelinus): An evaluation of spawning habitats, rearing strategies and trophic polymorphisms

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Common gardens in teosintes reveal the establishment of a syndrome of adaptation to altitude

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stocked-Fish Introgression into Wild Brook Trout Populations Depends on Habitat

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKinney, G. J., Varian, A., Scardina, J., & Nichols, K. M. (2014). Genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout salvelinus fontinalis commonly stocked in lake superior. PLoS ONE, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113809

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 4

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

61%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

22%

Environmental Science 4

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0