Nivolumab and ISA 101 HPV vaccine in incurable HPV-16+ cancer

  • Glisson B
  • Massarelli E
  • William W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Vaccines directed against Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) do not generally mediate regression of invasive cancer. To test the hypothesis that the efficacy of vaccine‐induced T cells may be amplified through treatment with immune checkpoint antibodies, we conducted a phase II trial of ISA 101, a synthetic long‐peptide HPV‐16 vaccine, and nivolumab in pts with incurable HPV‐16+ cancer. Methods: Tumors were HPV‐genotype 16 by Cervista HPV16/18. Patients were ECOG PS 0‐1 with up to one prior regimen for recurrence. ISA101 100 mcgs/peptide was given Days 1, 22, 50. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given iv every 2 wks beginning day 8 for up to one year. Imaging was obtained baseline, 11 wks and every 6 wks thereafter. The primary objective was assessment of overall response rate (ORR) targeting 30%. Secondary objectives: tolerability, PFS, OS. A Simon two stage design required response in 2/15 first stage and 5/25 in second stage. Results: The trial accrued 24 patients; 22 with oropharynx cancer (OPC) and 1 pt each with anal and cervical cancer. 18 pts (75%) had progression within 6mos of prior platin and 1 was platin‐naïve. 12 pts (50%) had prior cetuximab. Treatment was frontline for recurrence in 10/24 and second line in 14/24. ORR is 33% (8/24): 1 CR, 7 PR (1 unconfirmed), 3(13%) SD, 13 (54%) PD. ORR in OPC pts is 36% (8/22). 6/8 pts with PR progressed within 6 mos of prior platin. Median duration of response 30.1+ wks (6‐ 49+ wks); 5/8 pts with PR remain in response. Median PFS is 2.7 mos [95% CI 2.3‐8.0 mos] and median OS is not reached with median follow up time among censored pts 8.6 mos. PFS rate at 6 mos: 33%, [16‐52%] OS rate at 6 mos 74%, [51‐87%] . Toxicity: grade 3 transaminase and grade 4 lipase elevation in 1 pt each, grade 1‐2 toxicity: fever (5 pts), injection site reaction (6 pts), transaminase elevation, fatigue, nausea (3 pts each). Conclusions: The primary endpoint was met and ORR of 36% in OPC pts compares favorably to 16% for nivolumab monotherapy in p16+ OPC pts in Checkmate 141 (Ferris RL et al N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1856). These data suggest that the efficacy of vaccine‐induced T cells can be augmented by anti‐PD‐1 therapy, mitigating the influence of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Our findings merit confirmation in a larger randomized trial. Correlation of efficacy outcomes with immunoprofiling of tumors will be presented.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glisson, B., Massarelli, E., William, W. N., Johnson, F. M., Kies, M. S., Ferrarotto, R., … Melief, C. (2017). Nivolumab and ISA 101 HPV vaccine in incurable HPV-16+ cancer. Annals of Oncology, 28, v403–v404. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx376.002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

69%

Researcher 5

31%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

78%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Computer Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free