Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning-Based Classifications

65Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the most prevalent cancers worldwide is skin cancer, and it is becoming more common as the population ages. As a general rule, the earlier skin cancer can be diagnosed, the better. As a result of the success of deep learning (DL) algorithms in other industries, there has been a substantial increase in automated diagnosis systems in healthcare. This work proposes DL as a method for extracting a lesion zone with precision. First, the image is enhanced using Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networks (ESRGAN) to improve the image’s quality. Then, segmentation is used to segment Regions of Interest (ROI) from the full image. We employed data augmentation to rectify the data disparity. The image is then analyzed with a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a modified version of Resnet-50 to classify skin lesions. This analysis utilized an unequal sample of seven kinds of skin cancer from the HAM10000 dataset. With an accuracy of 0.86, a precision of 0.84, a recall of 0.86, and an F-score of 0.86, the proposed CNN-based Model outperformed the earlier study’s results by a significant margin. The study culminates with an improved automated method for diagnosing skin cancer that benefits medical professionals and patients.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep residual learning for image recognition

175065Citations
50380Readers
Get full text

ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge

30529Citations
10811Readers
Get full text
9585Citations
8974Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alwakid, G., Gouda, W., Humayun, M., & Sama, N. U. (2022). Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning-Based Classifications. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122481

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

47%

Researcher 5

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 11

46%

Engineering 10

42%

Mathematics 2

8%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0