Picking peaches or squeezing lemons: Selecting crowdsourcing workers for reducing cost of redundancy

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Crowdsourcing (CS) platforms are constantly gaining attention from both researchers and companies, due to the offered possibility of utilizing the “wisdom of crowds” in order to solve a great variety of problems. Despite the obvious advantages of such mechanisms, there are also numerous concerns regarding the quality assurance of work results produced by a large group of anonymous workers. In this work, we use data gathered from a real CS platform in order to study the performance of various approaches to worker selection, including a novel approach that utilizes automatic real-time monitoring of the produced results. We compare the performance of these mechanisms with respect to both overall cost and the accuracy of the final results to benchmark algorithms that aggregate results from a group of workers without pre-selection, relying solely on the “wisdom of crowd”. We find that our novel approach is capable of reducing the cost of obtaining high-quality aggregated results by a factor of four, without sacrificing quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adamska, P., Juźwin, M., & Wierzbicki, A. (2020). Picking peaches or squeezing lemons: Selecting crowdsourcing workers for reducing cost of redundancy. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12138 LNCS, pp. 510–523). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free