Comparison between physical image quality as measured by a newly developed phantom dedicated for digital mammography QC and that by European guidelines methods

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A quality control system for digital mammography consisting of a phantom for daily constancy test and software for image analysis and data management has been developed. The purpose of this study was to verify the measurement accuracy of the phantom and software, which was carried out by comparison of the result obtained from the method in accordance with European Guidelines for the following image characteristics; 1) Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) 2) Geometric distortion 3) Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) 4) Homogeneity 5) Missed tissue at chest wall side and 6) Threshold contrast visibility. In CNR and MTF, relative differences of 10% and 20% respectively were confirmed though, they were due to the difference in samples used for each measurement and in measurement position, and then those differences were identified as being no problem for the constancy test. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusunoki, T., Tagi, M., Yosikawa, K., Arai, H., Uchiyama, N., Nagashima, C., & Kobayashi, H. (2008). Comparison between physical image quality as measured by a newly developed phantom dedicated for digital mammography QC and that by European guidelines methods. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5116 LNCS, pp. 196–203). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free