Efficient 3D tracking in urban environments with semantic segmentation

5Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new 3D tracking approach for self-localization in urban environments. In particular, we build on existing tracking approaches (i.e., visual odometry tracking and SLAM), additionally using the information provided by 2.5D maps of the environment. Since this combination is not straightforward, we adopt ideas from semantic segmentation to find a better alignment between the pose estimated by the tracker and the 2.5D model. Specifically, we show that introducing edges as semantic classes is highly beneficial for our task. In this way, we can reduce tracker inaccuracies and prevent drifting, thus increasing the tracker’s stability. We evaluate our approach for two different challenging scenarios, also showing that it is generally applicable in different application domains and that we are not limited to a specific tracking method.

References Powered by Scopus

Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation

24705Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust Real-Time Face Detection

11120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset

7402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

RGB2LIDAR: Towards Solving Large-Scale Cross-Modal Visual Localization

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic road scene knowledge for robust self-calibration of environment-observing vehicle cameras

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hirzer, M., Arth, C., Roth, P. M., & Lepetit, V. (2017). Efficient 3D tracking in urban environments with semantic segmentation. In British Machine Vision Conference 2017, BMVC 2017. BMVA Press. https://doi.org/10.5244/c.31.143

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

77%

Researcher 4

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 17

71%

Engineering 6

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free