Building scientific workflow with taverna and BPEL: A comparative study in cagrid

24Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With the emergence of "service oriented science," the need arises to orchestrate various services to facilitate scientific investigation - that is, to create "science workflows." In this paper we summarize our findings in providing a workflow solution for the caGrid service-based grid infrastructure. We choose BPEL and Taverna as candidate solutions, and compare their usability in the full lifecycle of a scientific workflow, including service discovery, service composition, workflow execution, and workflow result analysis. We determine that BPEL offers a comprehensive set of primitives for modeling processes of all flavors, while Taverna provides a more compact set of primitives and a functional programming model that eases data flow modeling. We hope that our analysis not only helps researchers choose a tool that meets their needs, but also provides some insight on how a workflow language and tool can fulfill the requirement of scientists. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, W., Missier, P., Madduri, R., & Foster, I. (2009). Building scientific workflow with taverna and BPEL: A comparative study in cagrid. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5472 LNCS, pp. 118–129). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01247-1_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free