Decreased mortality, laparotomy, and embolization rates for liver injuries during a 13-year period in a major Scandinavian trauma center

20Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

background Although non-operative management (NOM) has become the treatment of choice in hemodynamically normal patients with liver injuries, the optimal management of Organ Injury Scale (OIS) grades 4 and 5 injuries is still controversial. Oslo University Hospital Ulleval (OUHU) has since 2008 performed angiography only with signs of bleeding. Simultaneously, damage control resuscitation was implemented. Would these changes result in a decreased laparotomy rate and need for angioembolization (AE), as well as decreased mortality? Methods We performed a retrospective study on all adult patients with liver injuries admitted at OUHU between 2002 and 2014. The total study population and patients with OIS grades 4 and 5 liver injuries underwent comparison between the periods before (P1) and after (P2) August 1, 2008. results 583 patients were included (P1: 237, P2: 346), with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 29. The total population and the subgroup of OIS 4 and 5 injuries were comparable in age, gender, mechanism of injury, injury severity and physiology. Overall laparotomy rates decreased from P1 to P2 (35%–24%; p<0.01), as did the AE rate (11%–5%; p<0.01). The 30-day crude mortality decreased from 14% to 7% (p<0.05). A logistic regression model predicted an OR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.98) for dying when admitted in P2. In OIS grades 4 and 5 injuries (n=149, median ISS 34), similar reduction in AE rate was seen (30%–12%; p<0.05). The NOM rate for OIS grades 4 and 5 injuries was 70%, with 98% success rate. For the 30% requiring surgery, the mortality remained high (P1 52%; P2 40%), despite more balanced transfusion strategy. Discussion Changes in resuscitation and treatment protocols were associated with decreased laparotomy, and AE rates as well as overall mortality. NOM is safe in 70% of patients with OIS grades 4 and 5 injuries, in contrast to the critically ill 30% requiring surgery who still have poor outcome. Level of evidence IV.

References Powered by Scopus

Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: The PROPPR randomized clinical trial

1977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The major trauma outcome study: Establishing national norms for trauma care

1046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organ injury scaling: Spleen and liver (1994 revision)

996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Liver trauma: WSES 2020 guidelines

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hemostatic performance and biocompatibility of chitosan-based agents in experimental parenchymal bleeding

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improvement in geriatric trauma outcomes in an evolving trauma system

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaski, I. A., Skattum, J., Brooks, A., Koyama, T., Eken, T., Naess, P. A., & Gaarder, C. (2018). Decreased mortality, laparotomy, and embolization rates for liver injuries during a 13-year period in a major Scandinavian trauma center. Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000205

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Researcher 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Computer Science 1

13%

Arts and Humanities 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0