AHP validated literature review of forgery type dependent passive image forgery detection with explainable AI

9Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nowadays, a lot of significance is given to what we read today: newspapers, magazines, news channels, and internet media, such as leading social networking sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. These are the primary wellsprings of phony news and are frequently utilized in malignant manners, for example, for horde incitement. In the recent decade, a tremendous increase in image information generation is happening due to the massive use of social networking services. Various image editing software like Skylum Luminar, Corel PaintShop Pro, Adobe Photoshop, and many others are used to create, modify the images and videos, are significant concerns. A lot of earlier work of forgery detection was focused on traditional methods to solve the forgery detection. Recently, Deep learning algorithms have accomplished high-performance accuracies in the image processing domain, such as image classification and face recognition. Experts have applied deep learning techniques to detect a forgery in the image too. However, there is a real need to explain why the image is categorized under forged to understand the algorithm's validity; this explanation helps in mission-critical applications like forensic. Explainable AI (XAI) algorithms have been used to interpret a black box's decision in various cases. This paper contributes a survey on image forgery detection with deep learning approaches. It also focuses on the survey of explainable AI for images.

References Powered by Scopus

Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks

11276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation

3289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deconvolutional networks

1470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Detection and Localization of Multiple Image Splicing Using MobileNet V1

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple image splicing dataset (Misd): A dataset for multiple splicing

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MiniNet: a concise CNN for image forgery detection

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadam, K., Ahirrao, S., & Kotecha, K. (2021, October 1). AHP validated literature review of forgery type dependent passive image forgery detection with explainable AI. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp4489-4501

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

47%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

50%

Engineering 4

29%

Social Sciences 2

14%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free