Combining Bayesian networks and fishbone diagrams to distinguish between intentional attacks and accidental technical failures

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Because of modern societies’ dependence on industrial control systems, adequate response to system failures is essential. In order to take appropriate measures, it is crucial for operators to be able to distinguish between intentional attacks and accidental technical failures. However, adequate decision support for this matter is lacking. In this paper, we use Bayesian Networks (BNs) to distinguish between intentional attacks and accidental technical failures, based on contributory factors and observations (or test results). To facilitate knowledge elicitation, we use extended fishbone diagrams for discussions with experts, and then translate those into the BN formalism. We demonstrate the methodology using an example in a case study from the water management domain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chockalingam, S., Pieters, W., Teixeira, A., Khakzad, N., & van Gelder, P. (2019). Combining Bayesian networks and fishbone diagrams to distinguish between intentional attacks and accidental technical failures. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11086 LNCS, pp. 31–50). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15465-3_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free