The Aesthetics of The Artificial–Critical Design’s Lost Dominion

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In its broadest sense, Digital Art spans everything from high-end machine learning applications through to the use of interactive elements, within traditional media. This paper surveys the domain’s full range, with indicative examples, described from the early days of the domain up to today. The examples, embody archetypal commonalities that allow categorisation; Digital Production, Distribution, Engagement and Subject matter, as well as eight sub-themes within the groupings. These are detailed and comprise; automation, presentation, distribution, interaction, simulation, immersion, transformation and hybridisation. The categories and sub-themes, demonstrate the diversity of the field and its maturity, even in areas that overlap with many areas outside of artistic production including Critical Design (Dunne, 1998). In this context, the paper asks the implicit question, of whether emergent strands in contemporary design research and practice (e.g. Design Anthropology), might benefit from a deeper and nuanced exploration of the Digital Art domain.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knight, J. (2017). The Aesthetics of The Artificial–Critical Design’s Lost Dominion. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S354–S364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free