Are groundwater inputs into river-dominated areas important? The Chao Phraya River - Gulf of Thailand

72Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We used the natural geochemical tracers radon-222 and radium isotopes (223Ra, 224Ra, 226Ra, 228Ra) to assess exchange rates between the Chao Phraya River and the Gulf of Thailand, and the magnitude of groundwater discharge in the estuary. We performed tracer surveys during two periods in 2004, in January (dry season, gauged river discharge 47 m3 s-1) and in July (wet season, 430 m 3 s-1). The isotopic data suggested that there are at least three different sources of these tracers in the estuary: river water, seawater, and groundwater. We estimated the extent of each input via a mixing model using 222Rn, 223Ra, and 224Ra activities and 224Ra:223Ra ratios. Our analysis showed that the largest groundwater outflow occurs near the mouth of the river. Our groundwater discharge estimates based on the mixing model are 10 and 16 m3 s -1 for January and July, respectively. An independent estimate of groundwater discharge in July using a mass balance of excess 226Ra together with our estimated water exchange rates based on 224Ra: 223Ra ratios resulted in a range of 14-19 m3 s -1, depending upon the estimated amount of desorbable radium. Our estimated groundwater inputs therefore represent about 20% of the river flow during low flow in January and 4% during high flow conditions in July 2004. The unit shoreline flux (∼200 m3 m-1 d-1 in July) for the area around the river mouth is over one order of magnitude higher than two other areas of the Gulf of Thailand where groundwater fluxes have been evaluated. © 2006, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dulaiova, H., Burnett, W. C., Wattayakorn, G., & Sojisuporn, P. (2006). Are groundwater inputs into river-dominated areas important? The Chao Phraya River - Gulf of Thailand. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(5), 2232–2247. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free