How does averaging affect protein structure comparison on the ensemble level?

27Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent algorithmic advances and continual increase in computational power have made it possible to simulate protein folding and dynamics on the level of ensembles. Furthermore, analyzing protein structure by using ensemble representation is intrinsic to certain experimental techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance. This creates a problem of how to compare an ensemble of molecules with a given reference structure. Recently, we used distance-based root-mean-square deviation (dRMS) to compare the native structure of a protein with its unfolded-state ensemble. We showed that for small, mostly α-helical proteins, the mean unfolded-state Cα-Cα distance matrix is significantly more nativelike than the Cα-Cα matrices corresponding to the individual members of the unfolded ensemble. Here, we give a mathematical derivation that shows that, for any ensemble of structures, the dRMS deviation between the ensemble-averaged distance matrix and any given reference distance matrix is always less than or equal to the average dRMS deviation of the individual members of the ensemble from the same reference matrix. This holds regardless of the nature of the reference structure or the structural ensemble in question. In other words, averaging of distance matrices can only increase their level of similarity to a given reference matrix, relative to the individual matrices comprising the ensemble. Furthermore, we show that the above inequality holds in the case of Cartesian coordinate-based root-mean-square deviation as well. We discuss this in the context of our proposal that the average structure of the unfolded ensemble of small helical proteins is close to the native structure, and demonstrate that this finding goes beyond the above mathematical fact. © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.

References Powered by Scopus

The Protein Data Bank

32364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The OPLS Potential Functions for Proteins. Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin

4564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rattle: A "velocity" version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations

2663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Free-energy landscape, principal component analysis, and structural clustering to identify representative conformations from molecular dynamics simulations: The myoglobin case

388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular simulation as an aid to experimentalists

171Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clustering support vector machines for protein local structure prediction

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zagrovic, B., & Pande, V. S. (2004). How does averaging affect protein structure comparison on the ensemble level? Biophysical Journal, 87(4), 2240–2246. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.042184

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 15

39%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16

40%

Chemistry 13

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

18%

Physics and Astronomy 4

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free