Adaptive control of human action: The role of outcome representations and reward signals

16Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present paper aims to advance the understanding of the control of human behavior by integrating two lines of literature that so far have led separate lives. First, one line of literature is concerned with the ideomotor principle of human behavior, according to which actions are represented in terms of their outcomes. The second line of literature mainly considers the role of reward signals in adaptive control. Here, we offer a combined perspective on how outcome representations and reward signals work together to modulate adaptive control processes. We propose that reward signals signify the value of outcome representations and facilitate the recruitment of control resources in situations where behavior needs to be maintained or adapted to attain the represented outcome. We discuss recent research demonstrating how adaptive control of goal-directed behavior may emerge when outcome representations are co-activated with positive reward signals. © 2013 Marien, Aarts and Custers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marien, H., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2013). Adaptive control of human action: The role of outcome representations and reward signals. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free