Effect of different burs on the topography of smear layer formation on the dentinal surface: a scanning electron microscope study

9Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Whenever a hand or a rotary instrument is used to eliminate tooth tissue, the mineralized matrix shatters rather then being uniformly sheared, producing considerably quantities of cutting debris. Much of the debris made up of very small particles of mineralized collagen matrix over the surface of dentin is known as smear layer. The clinical outcome of dental restorations is dependent upon the surface preparations, smear layer formation and hybrid layer which which provides a stable adhesion. Different surface morphology is produced by use of different burs. The thickness of the smear layer is affected by various factors as type of the bur, use of water spray and speed of rotation. Bonding is enhanced when smear layer is completely removed or modifed. The purpose of this in vitro study is to evaluate the effect of different burs on the topography of the smear layer formation and thickness on dentinal surface.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development of a Cavity Disinfectant Containing Antibacterial Monomer MDPB

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bond strength of self-adhesive restorative materials affected by smear layer thickness but not dentin desiccation

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spectrophotometric analysis evaluating apical microleakage in retrograde filling using GIC, MTA and biodentine: An in-vitro study

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trivedi, P., Dube, M., Pandya, M., Sonigra, H., Vachhani, K., & Attur, K. (2014). Effect of different burs on the topography of smear layer formation on the dentinal surface: a scanning electron microscope study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 15(2), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1507

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

82%

Materials Science 1

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Physics and Astronomy 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0