Impact of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research was to determine the association between uterine weight and surgical outcomes of vaginal hysterectomies (VHs). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted through a residency training program for performing VH operations (N = 87) in the Hacettepe University Hospital, Slhhlye/Ankara, Turkey. VHs performed for benign gynecologic conditions were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) uterine weight <100 g and (2) uterine weight ≥100 g. Clinical characteristics, demographic features, surgical characteristics, and operative complications were compared between the groups. Results: There were 57 patients (65.5%) in group 1 (uterine weight <100 g) and 30 patients (34.5%) in group 2 (uterine weight ≥100 g). Mean uterine weights were 61.56 ± 17.98 g in group 1 and 146.30 ± 45.16 g in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of surgical procedures performed concomitantly. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of age (59.35 ± 9.95 for group 1 and 47.37 ± 3.64 for group 2; p < 0.001). In group 2, the following were statistically significantly higher: mean operation time (p < 0.001); delta Hb (p < 0.001); blood loss (p < 0.001); surgical complications (p < 0.005); mean total hospital stay (p < 0.001); analgesic needs (p < 0.001); blood transfusions (p < 0.02); and readmissions to the hospital (p < 0.001). Conclusions: All patients should be evaluated and scanned prior to VH to determine uterine size and weight in order to choose the best surgical approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanacan, A., Gunes, A. C., Unal, C., Usubutun, A., & Beksac, M. S. (2019). Impact of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 35(3), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2018.0097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free