Prevalence and severity levels of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: different assessment instruments

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze urinary incontinence prevalence and severity in prostatectomized men assessed by three different instruments. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with 152 men. The pad test, pad used, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (self-report) were considered. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, Kappa index, considering a significance level of 0.05. Results: urinary incontinence prevalence was 41.4%, 46.7% and 80.3% according to pad used, pad test and self-report. Positive correlations and moderate to poor agreement were found between the instruments. As for severity, most participants had mild incontinence. The largest number of cases of mild and severe incontinence was identified by self-report. Conclusions: the self-report showed higher values for prevalence of mild and severe severity levels. Through the identified differences, we propose that the objective assessment (pad used and pad test) be associated with individuals’ perception (self-report) to better estimate prevalence and severity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Mata, L. R. F., Azevedo, C., Izidoro, L. C. de R., Ferreira, D. F., Estevam, F. E. B., Amaral, F. M. A., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2021). Prevalence and severity levels of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: different assessment instruments. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 74(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0692

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free