Who Cares What She Thinks, What Does He Say? Links between Masculinity, In-Group Bonding and Gender Harassment

34Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previous research has linked threats to masculinity and gender harassment, the most pervasive form of sexual harassment. Using a computer harassment paradigm, an ingroup bonding explanation of this link was directly examined. The study was conducted with heterosexual male undergraduate students from an inner city Australian university. Participants received a threat to masculinity before being exposed to an ostensible gender ingroup member whose reaction to sexist jokes was manipulated. Data from 74 participants revealed that men high on conformity to masculine norms altered their behavior to correspond with feedback from the gender ingroup member after a masculinity threat, whereas men low on conformity to masculine norms rejected gender ingroup feedback after a masculinity threat. A variable examining reported liking of the gender ingroup member produced a similar pattern, while no changes were observed in reported liking of a gender outgroup member These results suggest that the perceived response of other members of the gender ingroup, but not members of the gender outgroup, influence men's proclivity to enact gender harassing behaviors. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hunt, C. J., & Gonsalkorale, K. (2014). Who Cares What She Thinks, What Does He Say? Links between Masculinity, In-Group Bonding and Gender Harassment. Sex Roles, 70(1–2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0324-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free