Democratization after Civil War: A Brush-Clearing Exercise

82Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Why do some states emerging from civil war take significant strides toward democracy while others do not? The existing literature comes to contradictory and puzzling findings, many of which, we argue, are driven by methodological problems. We examine the determinants of democratization in the short, medium, and long term after civil wars ending between 1945 and 1999. Other than a short-term effect of negotiated settlements, we find little support for the prominent claim that the outcome of the war shapes the prospects for postwar democratization. Neither does peacekeeping foster democratization. Meanwhile, consistent with the more general democratization literature, we find that economic development aids democratization while oil wealth hinders it. In short, we find the determinants of democratization to be much the same for post-civil war societies as for other societies. © 2012 International Studies Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortna, V. P., & Huang, R. (2012). Democratization after Civil War: A Brush-Clearing Exercise. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00730.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free