Private security companies: Agents of democracy or simply mercenaries?

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the setting up of the first private security companies (PSCs) the term has been synonymous with mercenaries. Such a claim was justified in the early days when there were strong links between these two groups of actors. Watchguard, for example, employed mercenaries to launch a military operation against Qadaffi in 1970 (Hoe 1999: 410). Since then, the industry has changed beyond recognition. Instead of being perceived as guns for hire, many in the international community now recognize that PSCs can make a valuable contribution to international peace and security through training and other areas of expertise. What is emerging today is their integration into strategic complexes that now operate in many parts of the developing world and that are responsible for addressing the democratic deficit found in many weak and failing states. As the chapter explains below, such complexes are made up of governments, international organizations, international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), multinational corporations and now PSCs. © 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kinsey, C. (2007). Private security companies: Agents of democracy or simply mercenaries? In Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects (pp. 87–104). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free