Taming Leviathan as merchant: Lingering questions about the practical application of trans-Pacific partnership’s state-owned enterprises rules

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The suspended provisions of Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTTP will not substantially affect the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Chapter 17 on State-owned enterprises (SOEs). As a consequence, the original TPP scheme remains an important treaty model and poses complex questions notwithstanding a growing literature. This article discusses TPP but unlike current writings which focus on comparative treaty methods of SOE regulation, we focus on how TPP/ CPTPP will actually operate, paying attention to how its framers have defined an SOE not least in how they have viewed complex crossholdings, excluded non-profits, and preserved a role for State monopolies. Our answers differ from some of the existing literature – particularly on complex cross-holdings. We also provide detailed illustrations of how TPP’s non-discrimination, commercial basis, and non-commercial assistance rules might work and comment on the chances of a rule cascade triggered by TPP, particularly in the current state of heightened Sino-American rivalry and allegations of State control in China’s economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsushita, M., & Lim, C. L. (2020). Taming Leviathan as merchant: Lingering questions about the practical application of trans-Pacific partnership’s state-owned enterprises rules. World Trade Review, 19(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745619000168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free