e8 Abstract Unlike estrogen receptor (ER)–positive and HER2-positive breast can-cer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks a repertoire of targeted therapies. Hence, chemotherapy is the only available systemic option in current clinical practice. In general, survival of patients with TNBC is worse than that for those with ER-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer, especially for advanced-stage disease. Thus, a great unmet need exists. Conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as platinum-salts have been examined for specific benefit in TNBC; however, no one agent has yet been shown to offer a differential incremental benefit in metastatic TNBC. The hope is that ongoing research in tar-getable molecular pathways will lead to new therapeutic options for TNBC. Because these patients are likely to be increasingly subcatego-rized using potentially targetable molecular alterations, investigators will need to be mindful of the challenges in designing and conduct-ing clinical trials in smaller subpopulations. The successful incorpora-tion of targeted therapies in routine clinical practice for TNBC, which mirrors the success achieved by anti-HER2 and endocrine therapies, is awaited. (J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015;13:(e8–e18) and rare types, such as adenoid cystic, metaplastic, apo-crine, and neuroendocrine carcinoma. 3 Nevertheless, the clinical utility of this categorization has been robust as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. Patients with TNBC are more likely to have a poor prognosis than those with estrogen receptor (ER)/ progesterone receptor (PR)–positive and/or HER2-pos-itive breast cancer. 4 This is likely partially attributable to a dearth of novel therapeutic options for TNBC, in contrast to the recent expansion of endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies (eg, ado-trastuzumab-emtansine, per-tuzumab, everolimus with exemestane). 5–7 Therefore, great interest has been shown in exploring potential biomarkers (prognostic and predictive) and developing new therapeutic options. This article reviews current treatment options (" where are we now? ") and ongoing therapeutic research (" where are we going? ") for TNBC.
CITATION STYLE
Morikawa, A., & Seidman, A. D. (2015). Treating Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Where Are We? Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 13(2), e8–e18. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0032
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.