When two 'wrongs' make a right: An essay on business ethics

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sometimes two wrongs do make a right. That is, others' violations of moral rules may make it permissible for one to also violate these rules, to avoid being unfairly disadvantaged. This claim, originally advanced by Hobbes, is applied to three cases in business. It is suggested that the claim is one source of scepticism concerning business ethics. I argue, however, that the conditions under which business competitors' violations of moral rules would render one's own violations permissible are quite restricted. Hence, the observation that two wrongs may make a right does not give people a broad warrant for ignoring moral standards in their business activities. © 1984 Random House, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kavka, G. S. (1983). When two “wrongs” make a right: An essay on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free