Three More Arguments Against Early Abortion

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The main purpose of this chapter is to examine three arguments – from Hare, Marquis and Harman – that, whether by design or not, place the permissibility of the early abortion in doubt. Each of the three arguments is grounded in positions that seem to assign at least some moral significance to the loss incurred by a merely possible person when that person is left out of existence altogether. Those positions are, in turn, at odds with the account of the moral significance of loss that Variabilism itself suggests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, M. A. (2010). Three More Arguments Against Early Abortion. In Philosophy and Medicine (Vol. 107, pp. 121–143). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3792-3_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free